Get the content you want anytime you want.
REGISTER NOW | SIGN IN
ARTICLE

A Deeper Look at the Efficacy of Off-Label C. difficile Treatments

JAN 02, 2017 | RACHEL LUTZ
There is a long list of off-label therapeutic options that currently exist for treating Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) infection, but in combination these options can develop into viable, approved treatments, according to a recently published product review.

Researchers from the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona in Spain analyzed and summarized novel, neglected, and controversial C. difficile infection treatments to determine which could become part of daily practice. The team wrote that the current treatments–such as the three main antibiotics recommended for C. difficile infection (metronidazole, vancomycin and fidaxomicin)–do not exceed 80% to 90% cure rates. Additionally, sustained cure rates may drop as low as 75% among patients who use fidaxomicin, which is considered the best available treatment option, since it lowers relapse rates better than the other two antibiotics.
 
“The number of potential therapies for C. difficile infection has been growing steadily recently, and this trend may continue for some years, as both the incidence and severity of C. difficile keep increasing, and current therapeutics cannot offer a definite solution for this situation,” the study authors wrote.

These products fit into five categories:
  1. Antibiotics and non-antibiotics agents with bacteriostatic/ bactericidal effect against C. difficile
  2. Toxin neutralizing agents
  3. Therapies that boost host immune defense against C. difficile infection
  4. Treatments that modulate the intestinal environment to make it less favorable for C. difficile colonization
  5. Anti-inflammatory substances that prevent or reduce enterocyte damage caused by C. difficile toxins. These agents are in various stages of development, while some of them are already being tested in Phase 3 trials. 
Among the antibiotics and non-antibiotic agents, the aim is to eliminate the bacteria against an infection that is already established. For example, rifamycins, such as rifaximin and rifalazil, inhabit bacterial RNA synthesis and are used in treating patient’s diarrhea with the benefit of having very little beneficial effect on the normal intestinal microbiota.

These have been tested in hamster models and found to be as effective as vancomycin.


FEATURED
The new test can differentiate between Lyme disease and 7 other tick-borne diseases.