As hospitals continue to search for new ways to limit their number of patients acquiring Clostridium difficile
) infections, a new study shows promise in the use of ultraviolet light technology
for ridding patient rooms of highly resistant C. difficile
The challenge in fighting C. difficile
is two-fold: not only are strains of the bacterium increasingly hard to treat in patients, but the superbug spores
can live on environmental surfaces for months and are resistant to many disinfectant products. C. difficile
infections can create a vicious cycle for healthcare facilities – patients who are admitted to hospitals for other reasons and receive antibiotic treatment can, in turn, become a greater risk for infection by other pathogens they come in contact with; when C. difficile
spores persist in healthcare environments they can readily infect those at-risk patients. Today, at least 80% C. difficile
infections remain healthcare-associated, placing the onus on hospitals to find the right measures to bring these rates down.
In tackling the issue of surface area spores, a recent study
conducted by doctors at the University of Pennsylvania investigated the impact of using an ultraviolet wavelength C germicidal irradiation device
. This technology uses a tall UV lamp to disinfect hospital rooms and kill the C. difficile
spores that are harder to eradicate.
“The principle benefit is the rapid onset of action permitting short deployment times and thereby limiting impact on room cleaning and turn-around times,” study author David A. Pegues, MD, told Contagion
. “The principle limitation is shadowing. Direct exposure of surfaces to UV light is required for optimal spore and bacterial killing, so some time is required to stage the room – opening drawers and moving furniture from against the wall.”
The study was conducted at three hematology and oncology inpatient units at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania with high rates of C. difficile
, which persisted even after two years of efforts made to reduce infection rates. These efforts included antibiotic stewardship, contact precautions, daily patient bathing, use of antimicrobial soap by doctors, and use of bleach to clean room surfaces. In a 12-month evaluation period of the UV light device, the study team focused primarily on the terminal cleaning of patient rooms in which patients with C. difficile
infections had stayed. All told, the UV device was deployed after 541 of a total 2,569 patient discharges. After cleaning all room surfaces with a bleach disinfectant, the UV device was placed in the room and ran for two eight-minute cycles, one each at either side of the foot of the bed. When the device did not fit in the bathroom, it was used in proximity to the doorway to disinfect surfaces such as the sink and the toilet. During the study period, rates of C. difficile
infection dropped 25% in all patient units included in the study, whereas the rate went up 16% in units that had not been included in the study, indicating a strong association between UV light disinfection and a reduction in C. difficile
Dr. Pegues noted that while his team’s study focused on rooms of patients who had active C. difficile
infections during their hospital stay, the study did not look for patients who might be asymptomatic carriers of the bacteria but can still shed the spores. “Patients who have C. difficile
fecal carriage but who have not been diagnosed with C. difficile
infection may also shed C. difficile
spores that persist in the hospital environment,” explained Dr. Pegues. “Thus there may be additional benefit to expanding the deployment of UV disinfection to the rooms of other at risk patients, or all rooms in units with high rates of C. difficile
The authors estimated the annual costs for the first year of operation of the UV device program to be $294,342 and $194,250 for the second year. With 53 fewer cases of hospital-acquired C. difficile
than reported in the previous year, the researchers say their program has an annual savings in infection-related expenses of $348,528 to $1,537,000 a year.
“There is a capital cost for acquisition and maintenance of the UV equipment and to staff for optimal deployment,” says Dr. Pegues. “Even considering these costs, the substantial reduction in C. difficile
infection and the estimated medical cost averted resulted in a cost effective intervention.”
To stay informed on the latest in infectious disease news and developments, please sign up for our weekly newsletter.