Treating HCV in HIV-Coinfection: Still a Therapeutic Dilemma?

Publication
Article
ContagionNovember 2017
Volume 2
Issue 4

Despite the availability of highly active agents against HCV, HIV-infected patients require special considerations for drug interactions when considering treatment options.

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects an estimated 2.7 million to 3.9 million people in the United States.

1

HCV can lead to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and end-stage liver disease if left untreated. In patients with HIV, the progression to cirrhosis is more rapid than in mono-infected patients.

2

In the United States, about one-quarter of HIV infected patients are also coinfected with HCV.

3

Across the world, patients with HIV are 6 times more likely to be infected with HCV than the general population. People who inject drugs are most likely to have coinfection, and in the United States, 50% to 90% of HIV-infected injection drug users are also coinfected with HCV.

3,4

All patients with HIV infection should be screened at least once for HCV. In patients with continued risk factors, such as intravenous (IV) drug use or men who have sex with men, HCV screening should be repeated.

5,6

Consequently, there are several treatment sensitivities that need to be taken into account when treating coinfected individuals.

Treatment Considerations

The overall treatment response to interferon and ribavirin has been found to be low in HCV-mono-infected patients, and HIV coinfected patients have been shown to have an even lower response.

7

Well-tolerated and efficacious oral drug regimens now exist for the treatment of the general patient population with HCV, which now includes patients coinfected with HIV. With one exception, there is no difference in the efficacy of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in an HIV-coinfected or mono-infected patient, and the current guidelines recommend that HIV-infected patients be treated the same as noninfected patients.

5

When the decision is made to treat HCV, consideration must be given to drug interactions with HIV therapy. None of the currently available DAAs are free from drug interactions with HIV antiviral agents. Although some clinicians may choose to defer antiretroviral therapy (ART) until HCV therapy is completed, the US Department of Health and Human Services HIV guidelines recommend ART should be initiated in all HIV/HCV coinfected patients regardless of their CD4 cell count.

8

HIV therapy should not be withheld to facilitate easier treatment with DAAs; rather, the patient should be referred to an HIV specialist who can select an HIV regimen to accommodate HCV therapy by avoiding drug—drug interactions and toxicities. In general, most pharmacy benefit managers require patients to be on a stable HIV regimen prior to beginning HCV therapy.

New Therapies

Prior to August 2017, shortened regimens were not recommended for HCV treatment in coinfected patients. Ledipasvir/ sofosbuvir was not recommended to be shortened to 8 weeks, even if the patient was treatment-naïve and noncirrhotic and had a low-baseline HCV viral load.

5

Now, the recommendations include glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB), a newly approved pangenotypic combination of an NS3/4A protease inhibitor and an NS5A inhibitor. It is administered as 3 tablets of GLE 100 mg/ PIB 40 mg once daily with food, and can be used for 8 weeks in select populations. In addition to having pangenotypic properties, GLE/PIB does not undergo renal excretion, allowing it to be used without dose adjustment in patients with chronic kidney disease and on dialysis.

9

In the EXPEDITION-2 trial to study GLE/ PIB, a total of 137 coinfected patients without cirrhosis received 8 weeks of GLE/PIB, while 16 patients with cirrhosis received 12 weeks of GLE/PIB. All the patients were treatment- naïve or previously treated with pegylated interferon/ribavirin with or without sofosbuvir. The treatment duration in the study is identical to current US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)—approved treatment durations and is the same for mono-infected patients.

The study results showed 99.3% sustained viral response for 12 or more weeks (SVR12) in patients receiving GLE/PIB for 8 weeks. This includes 1 patient who withdrew from the study due to an unrelated adverse effect. In patients with cirrhosis, all but 1 patient attained SVR12, although this was a small group of patients. None of the patients had HIV breakthrough. The combination of GLE/PIB was well tolerated, with none of the patients reporting an adverse effect related to the study drug. Efficacy was similar to other clinical trials that did not include the HIV-infected population. All ART agents used in the trial were free of drug interactions with GLE/ PIB. None of the patients were on protease inhibitor—boosted antivirals, in whom coadministration with GLE/PIB is not recommended.

9,10

Efavirenz should also be avoided with GLE/PIB due to the risk of decreased GLE/PIB levels. Of note, when using GLE/PIB with elvitegravir/cobicistat-based regimens, a dose adjustment is not required.

9

The current guidelines do not yet address the use of GLE/PIB; however, it is likely that this agent will be recommended for use in the HIV population.

5

Additional research has shown that currently available nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitors for HCV infection— ledipasvir and velpatasvir—interacted with the HIV therapy drug tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF).

5

Because 4 out of 5 of the first-line—recommended HIV regimens contain tenofovir, this interaction could affect a number of coinfected patients.

8

Through P-glycoprotein inhibition, levels of TDF could increase, potentially causing increased (stronger or more) adverse effects. This is more concerning in patients with preexisting renal impairment, even with a glomerular filtration rate of 60 mL/min.

5

No dose adjustment is required; however, it is necessary to monitor for TDF toxicity. In April 2016, the FDA approved the new formulation of tenofovir, tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), as part of the combination drug Descovy (emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide). TAF is a new oral prodrug of TDF, a nucleotide analogue that inhibits HIV-1 transcription. Unlike TDF, TAF is a more stable prodrug of tenofovir (TFV) in the plasma, which allows for high concentrations of TFV inside target cells. This reduces the plasma TFV exposures at approximately one-tenth the clinically approved dose of TDF.

11

Intracellular activation of TAF allows for higher concentrations inside target cells and a lower concentration of TFV in the plasma, reducing off-target toxicities such as renal and bone complications. TAF is much safer to use in patients with renal impairment as part of their nucelos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backbone. This makes tenofovir one of the safest NRTIs, with minimal hepatic toxicity and few to no drug interactions with HCV drug regimens.

Conclusion

Highly active agents against HCV are available for HIV-infected individuals coinfected with HCV, including a new option allowing for an 8-week treatment duration in treatment-naïve patients without cirrhosis. Although there is no difference in efficacy in coinfected patients, the HIV-infected patient will still need special considerations regarding drug interactions when considering treatment for HCV infection. Consultation with HIV and HCV specialists is crucial when drug interactions exist. Fortunately, most of the commonly used HIV therapies do not have many drug interactions with HCV therapy. Five out of the 6 recommended first-line antiretroviral therapies are integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based regimens, which do not have any drug interactions with HCV therapy, with the exception of elvitegravir boosted cobicistat (See Table). Because HIV-infected patients remain a less-studied population in the treatment of HCV, despite the high risk for coinfection, more research should be done on medications with less potential for cross-reactivity.

Table

Dr. Andres is a clinical assistant professor at Temple University School of Pharmacy who practices in a hepatology clinic. She received a PharmD from Temple University School of Pharmacy and completed PGY-1 pharmacy practice residency at the Martinsburg Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Martinsburg, West Virginia.

Dr. Cheng is a clinical assistant professor with a specialty in HIV pharmacotherapy at Temple University School of Pharmacy. She received her PharmD at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy and completed a PGY-1 pharmacy practice residency at Penn Presbyterian Medical Center and a PGY-2 HIV ambulatory care/clinical pharmacogenetics residency at the University of Houston College of Pharmacy. She is an active member of AAHIVM.

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hepatitis C FAQs for health practitioners. http://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/hcv/hcvfaq.htm. Published January 27, 2017. Accessed August 2017.
  2. Lo Re V, Kallan MJ, Tate JP, et al. Hepatic decompensation in antiretroviral-treated patients co-infected with HIV and hepatitis C virus compared with hepatitis C virus-monoinfected patients: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(6):369-379. doi: 10.7326/M13-1829.
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS and viral hepatitis. https://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/populations/hiv.htm. Updated June 6, 2017. Accessed August 2017.
  4. Platt L, Easterbrook P, Gower E, et al. Prevalence and burden of HCV co-infection in people living with HIV: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(7):797—808. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00485-5.
  5. AASLD/IDSA HCV Guidance Panel (2015), Hepatitis C guidance: AASLD-IDSA recommendations for testing, managing, and treating adults infected with hepatitis C virus. Hepatology, 62: 932—954. doi:10.1002/hep.27950.
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Testing recommendations for hepatitis C virus infection. 2015. https://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/hcv/guidelinesc.htm. Updated October 15, 2015. Accessed August 2017.
  7. Tural C, Galeras JA, Planas R, et al. Differences in virological response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin between hepatitis C virus (HCV)-monoinfected and HCV-HIV-coinfected patients. Antivir Ther. 2008;13(8):1047-55.
  8. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services. http://aidsinfo.nih.gov/contentfiles/lvguidelines/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf. Accessed August 2017.
  9. Mavyret [package insert]. North Chicago, IL: AbbVie Inc; 2017.
  10. Rockstroh J, Lacombe K, Viani RM, et al. Efficacy and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in patients co-infected with Hepatitis C virus and Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1: The EXPEDITION-2 Study. Presented at: Proceedings of the International Liver Congress; April 19, 23, 2017; Amsterdam, The Netherlands. http://natap.org/2017/EASL/EASL_04.htm. .
  11. Bam RA, Yant SR, and Cihlar T. Tenofovir alafenamide is not a substrate for renal organic anion transporters (OATs) and does not exhibit OAT-dependent cytotoxicity. Antiviral Ther. 2014;19:687-692. doi: 10.3851/IMP2770.
Related Videos
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.