|Videos|November 10, 2017

Treating C. difficile: The Downside to Current Approaches

Stuart Johnson, MD, discusses the disadvantages to some of the current approaches used to treat C. difficile.

Stuart Johnson, MD, infectious disease clinician in the Medicine/ID department at Loyola University Medical Center, discusses the disadvantages to some of the current approaches used to treat C. difficile.

Interview Transcript (modified slightly for readability):

“Traditionally, Clostridium difficile infection has been treated with antibiotics that are active against the bacteria; it’s a big of an irony that the disease is typically precipitated by antibiotic treatment meant for, say, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, et. cetera. But the treatment certainly involves classically, antibiotics directed against the organism.

The downside of this, of course, would be that the antibiotics are what got the patient into the situation they’re in, and the treatment, although usually effective for controlling the infection, also have a collateral damage to the flora, the gut that perpetuates this recurrence, if you will.”


Related to this article

Household Contacts Drive Most Hepatitis B Exposures in Young Children
Karen B. Jacobson, MD, MPH, of Kaiser Permanente Northern California, presented data at IDWeek 2026 showing 58.2% of children younger than five years exposed to active hepatitis B in the home were exposed by someone other than their birth mother, a risk maternal screening alone would miss under the CDC’s revised birth dose recommendation.
Inhaled Amikacin Shows Low Resistance Rates in MAC Lung Disease in ENCORE
In the phase 3b ENCORE trial, adding amikacin liposome inhalation suspension (ALIS) to azithromycin and ethambutol significantly improved culture conversion in newly diagnosed MAC lung disease, while treatment-emergent amikacin (2.2%) and macrolide (1.1%) resistance stayed rare. Kevin Winthrop, MD, provides insights around the study.
LMN-201 Reduces C difficile Recurrence
In the phase 2 RePreve trial, Lumen Bioscience’s investigational oral biologic LMN-201 plus standard antibiotics achieved global cure in 83.3% of patients with C difficile infection vs 36.4% with placebo, and cut recurrence sixfold (9.1% vs 55.6%) with no drug-related serious adverse events.