Merenstein points out that upper respiratory tract infections usually include the common cold, sore throat, sinus infections, and ear infections and have well established ways to determine if antibiotics should be prescribed; however, for LRTI, he says they have the potential to develop into a more severe infection and that about 3% to 5% of these patients have pneumonia. And without easy access to X-rays to rule out that respiratory illness, antibiotics without evidence of bacterial infection still may be prescribed, Merenstein surmises.2
He also points out that patients see their providers to seek out medicine for resolution of symptoms like a deep cough. “Patients don't necessarily want antibiotics, they want to get better,” Merenstein said.
What You Need to Know
Antibiotics do not significantly impact the duration or severity of acute lower respiratory tract infections (LTRI), including those caused by viral, bacterial, or mixed pathogens.
Patients often seek medication, including antibiotics, with the belief that it will hasten the resolution of symptoms like coughing.
There is a call for antibiotic stewardship efforts to educate both patients and physicians about the limited benefits of antibiotics for LTRI, especially in the absence of definitive evidence of bacterial infection.
What the Data Showed
The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of antibiotic use on the duration and severity of acute LRTI. Of the 718 patients with baseline data, 29% had an antibiotic prescribed. The antibiotics prescribed in this study for LRTI were all prescribed appropriate antibiotics to treat bacterial infections, the investigators reported. The most common antimicrobials included amoxicillin-clavulanate, azithromycin, doxycycline, and amoxicillin in 85% of patients.1
To determine if there was an actual bacterial or viral infection present, beyond the self-reported symptoms of a cough, the investigators confirmed the presence of pathogens with advanced lab tests to look for microbiologic results classified as only bacteria, only viruses, both virus and bacteria, or no organism detected. For those with a confirmed bacterial infection, the length of time until illness resolution was the same for those receiving an antibiotic versus those not receiving one, approximately 17 days.2
Ancillary Findings and Conclusions
“Receipt of an antibiotic did reduce the likelihood of a follow-up visit (14.1% vs 8.2%, aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26-0.84), perhaps by removing the motivation of getting an antibiotic at a follow-up visit,” the investigators pointed out.1
They also concluded there needs to be better alignment of expectations of resolving LRTI with antibiotics, especially in the absence of any definitive proof of bacterial infection. “Patients had unrealistic expectations regarding the duration of LRTI and the effect of antibiotics which should be the target of antibiotic stewardship efforts,” the investigators wrote.1
Merenstein makes a further distinction between pediatric and adult patient encounters. “So often now parents come in and just want what is best for [their children], ie not always antibiotics,” Merenstein said. “But for adults we seem to be lagging. The good news is we can change, and hopefully we won’t continue to have unrealistic expectations for cough.”
Reference
1.Merenstein DJ, Barrett B, Ebell MH. Antibiotics Not Associated with Shorter Duration or Reduced Severity of Acute Lower Respiratory Tract Infection. J Gen Intern Med. Published online April 15, 2024. doi:10.1007/s11606-024-08758-y
2.Antibiotics Aren’t Effective for Most Lower Tract Respiratory Infections. Georgetown University Medical Center press release. April 11, 2024. Accessed April 16, 2024.
https://www.newswise.com/articles/antibiotics-aren-t-effective-for-most-lower-tract-respiratory-infections