|Articles|October 15, 2019

Evaluating Ceftolozane/Tazobactam in Immunocompromised Patients with Pseudomonas Infections

Elizabeth Hirsch, PharmD, and Delaney Hart, PharmD, discuss their poster at IDWeek 2019.

Segment Description: Elizabeth Hirsch, PharmD, assistant professor at the University of Minnesota; and Delaney Hart, PharmD, PGY-1 pharmacy practice resident at Abbott Northwestern Hospital, discuss their poster at IDWeek 2019.

Interview transcript (modified slightly for readability):

Elizabeth Hirsch, PharmD: We looked at immunocompromised patients treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam and we think that this is an important population to study because typically phase 3 clinical trials do not include patients who are severely ill or immunocompromised. We specifically looked at patients with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas infections and focused in on an immunocompromised patient population because those patients are typically excluded.

Delaney Hart, PharmD: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients from 15 United States institutions. The patients were defined as immunocompromised based on either their disease state or if they were taking immunosuppressive agents.

In this study our primary goal was to look at the clinical outcomes of patients using ceftolozane/tazobactam specifically with MDR Pseudomonas infections. We evaluated specifically their clinical cure rate, which was defined as no escalation in therapy or discontinuation of therapy. We also evaluated 30-day all-cause mortality in these patients, specifically in immunocompromised patients.

The outcomes that we showed were a 69% rate of clinical cure and a 19% rate of 30-day all-cause mortality. Then, we those data points and we split it based on the patient's APACHE score. So with an APACHE score greater than 25, which would indicate a more acutely ill population, we also broke it down and found that when patients had an APACHE score greater than 25 they did have a higher rate of 30-day all-cause mortality.

Elizabeth Hirsch, PharmD: So based on the findings from our study we believe that ceftolozane/tazobactam is a good treatment choice for patients that are immunocompromised and infected with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas infections. Our clinical success rates and the 30-day all-cause mortality rates were similar to other populations of patients where similar outcomes have been studied.

The poster, Ceftolozane-Tazobactam (C/T) Treatment Outcomes in Immunocompromised (IC) Patients with Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) Infections, was presented at IDWeek 2019 in Washington DC.


Related to this article

This Week's Top 5 Infectious Disease News Stories: September 12-September 18, 2026
In this week's top infectious disease stories, a Pennsylvania teen became the state's fourth measles death in weeks, the CDC reported a 17% summer surge in rabies exposure calls, new research revisited whether cefepime raises mortality risk, a multihospital review examined ceftriaxone's safety after state alerts, and examining Legionella pneumonia diagnostics.
Measles Update: September 18, 2026
The latest CDC numbers show a 5.37% increase of measles cases from week-to-week. In Pennsylvania, the fourth measles-related death was reported in 2026. Additionally, the CDC has made a change in the way it will report deaths.
CDC Responds to Surge in Rabies Exposures
A "Clinician Outreach" from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in April anticipated an increase in rabies exposures, and the striking surge in case reports this summer prompted a recent health advisory alert from the federal agency.
New Diagnositics for Legionella Pneumonia May Streamline Care Continuum
Reported cases of Legionnaires’ disease have been on the rise for the past decade, and identifying Legionella bacteria requires specialized testing in the microbiology lab. Here is a clinical overview of Legionella bacteria, including required testing, treatment, and reporting to public health officials.
Ceftriaxone Safety: Separating Signal From Risk
A retrospective multihospital study found that severe adverse events occurred at similarly low rates with ceftriaxone and other IV cephalosporins suggesting there is no evidence to support avoiding ceftriaxone despite recent health department safety alerts.