|Articles|July 7, 2020

Switching to Second-Line Therapy Versus First-Line Antiretroviral

In low-level HIV-1 viraemia patients, this strategy demonstrated viral suppression in more than half of a study's participants.

Fifty-five percent of patients who had low-level HIV-1 viraemia and switched to a second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) achieved viral suppression.

The findings, presented during the International AIDS Society (IAS) AIDS 2020 Virtual Sessions this week, offered a glimpse of the benefit in switching to a second-line ART in this patient group.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has a guideline for virologic failure while using ART, which defines it as two consecutive viral loads (VL) '¥1000 copies/mL despite good adherence, then triggering an empiric switch to a next-line ART.

Investigators, led by Alain Amstutz, MD, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland, were seeking to assess if patients with sustained low-level HIV-1 viraemia on a first-line ART would benefit in a switch. The primary endpoint for the study was viral suppression (<50 copies/mL) at 9 months (36 weeks).

This multicenter, parallel-group, open-label, superiority, randomized, controlled trial enrolled patients on first-line ART containing non-nucleosidic reverse transcriptase inhibitors with two consecutive VLs '¥100 copies/mL, with the second VL between 100-999 copies/mL. The study was conducted at 8 clinics in Lesotho in Southern Africa.

The patient population consisted of 80 total participants who were eligible and randomly assigned to either the switch group (n=40) or control group (n=40).

The majority of the study’s participants were female (68%) with a median age of 42 years. Sixty-one percent of them were taking tenofovir disoproxil fumarate / lamivudine / efavirenz.

At nine months, 55% of study participants in the switch group versus 25% in the control group achieved viral suppression (adjusted difference 29%, 95% CI 8-50%, p=0·009). In addition, the switch group had significantly higher probability of viral suppression across different VL thresholds (<20, <100, <200, <400 copies/mL) but not for <1000 copies/mL.

In terms of safety, no adverse effects were witnessed.

“Switching to second-line ART among patients with low-level HIV-1 viraemia resulted in higher proportion of viral suppression,” the investigators concluded. “These results endorse lowering the threshold for virologic failure in future WHO guidelines.”


Related to this article

Asymptomatic C difficile Colonization in Infants Doesn’t Mean Benign
A new study in infants challenges the long-standing belief about the pathogen’s effects in the youngest pediatric population. Senior author Joseph Zackular, PhD, provides insights around his work including how it reshapes gut development and offers potential intervention strategies to shield neonates.
How The Food Safety Surveillance Infrastructure Works in the US
In the first episode of our news series looking at the food safety network, Lynette Johnston, PhD, offers insights into how the federal government surveillance infrastructure operates, and how epidemiologists serve as food detectives in determining bacterial pathogens and potential foodborne outbreaks.