Get the content you want anytime you want.

Fecal Transplants Less Effective Than Previously Thought

A total of 30 patients participated in the study between January 2011 and July 2014. Of those, 14 received the vancomycin taper (two withdrew early) and 16 received the shorter vancomycin treatment and a fecal transplant. Participants reported their symptoms and experiences by telephone and sent in stool samples for testing if and when diarrhea occurred after treatment had begun. The study subjects also provided stool samples at baseline, one week into treatment, and at the 120-day mark. The doctors ended the trial after the first 30 patients completed their testing because, “There was only a 3.4% probability of finding a significant benefit for fecal transplants.”
The group noted that their study only included a single fecal transplant, whereas studies reporting higher success rates often included multiple transplants in order to achieve success. “Enema route was chosen for delivery as it was supported by data, practical, inexpensive, and well-accepted by patients,” they said. They also noted that fecal transplants can be administered by colonoscopy or nasojejunal tube. “Interestingly, the patients tolerated the volume of enema (about two cups) surprisingly well,” said Dr. Hota, adding, “We chose a higher volume to cover as much bowel surface area as possible while understanding that retention might be adversely affected.” She noted that some earlier literature on fecal transplants used up to 1.5L as their target, and that “no one truly knows how much FMT (in terms of donor stool amount and final FMT volume) is necessary to bring about positive results.”
The study results may also have been limited by the pre-treatment of patients with a two-week regimen of oral vancomycin. “This may have negatively impacted the intestinal microbiota such that a single fecal transplant was not sufficient for flora reconstitution,” the group speculated. In addition, the small number of patients in the study and their inability to conduct the study blindly also presented a limitation. “There are many unanswered questions that remain about FMT because there are so many variables that affect its effectiveness,” Dr. Hota said.
Although the team found the results to be “initially disappointing, as they may be for some others reading the results that a single FMT by enema appeared no better than oral vancomycin taper for resolving recurrent CDI,” Dr. Hota said, she emphasized that FMT is “an important treatment that can be very effective for patients with recurrent CDI.” She noted the need for “more comparative research on FMT methodologies,” and reported that a new program at the University of Toronto, the Microbiota Therapeutics Outcomes Program (MTOP), has this research as its focus. “In the meantime,” she concluded, “clinicians need to ensure that patients know that FMT will not cure recurrent CDI in all instances.”
To stay informed on the latest in infectious disease news and developments, please sign up for our weekly newsletter.

Big advances in treatment can