|Articles|May 21, 2021

Antimicrobial Stewardship Opportunities in Non-Neutropenic Oncology Patients

Author(s)Killian Meara

Almost half of the participants in the study had an opportunity to improve their antibiotic regimen.

Antibiotic stewardship programs are most often focused on use in more general populations and there is typically hesitancy when it comes to assessing immunocompromised populations.

However, there is an opportunity to improve antibiotic use and patient outcomes in immunocompromised patients.

Investigators from Wayne State University, in collaboration with Henry Ford Hospital in Michigan, have recently conducted a study that sought to identify areas of opportunity for improvement in antimicrobial use in inpatient oncology patients.

The data was presented at the 23rd Annual Making a Difference in Infectious Disease Meeting 2021 virtual sessions.

The cross-sectional, cohort study included 200 oncology patients who were admitted to a large tertiary care academic medical center between August 1, 2018, and August 30, 2019. All participants were over the age of 18, had an oncologic history and received an antimicrobial agent.

Of the study participants, 77 had pulmonary infections, 34 had Intra-abdominal infections, 31 had urinary tract infections, 23 were septic, and 35 were categorized as other.

Findings showed that a total of 84 of the participants had at least one opportunity to improve their antibiotic regimen. Of those, empiric coverage discordance was the most common area for improvement.

Additionally, 83 of the participants experienced antibiotic related adverse events and 19 developed multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) within 90-days after their antibiotic therapy.

“This study identified that 42% of patients had an opportunity to improve at least one component of their antibiotic regimen,” the authors wrote. “Opportunities for improvement include assessing allergy history, optimizing empiric antibiotic coverage, avoiding dual anaerobic coverage, de-escalating based on microbiology cultures and susceptibilities, and switching from IV to oral therapies.”


Related to this article

This Week's Top 5 Infectious Disease News Stories: September 12-September 18, 2026
In this week's top infectious disease stories, a Pennsylvania teen became the state's fourth measles death in weeks, the CDC reported a 17% summer surge in rabies exposure calls, new research revisited whether cefepime raises mortality risk, a multihospital review examined ceftriaxone's safety after state alerts, and examining Legionella pneumonia diagnostics.
Ceftriaxone Safety: Separating Signal From Risk
A retrospective multihospital study found that severe adverse events occurred at similarly low rates with ceftriaxone and other IV cephalosporins suggesting there is no evidence to support avoiding ceftriaxone despite recent health department safety alerts.
Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis in a Trice
A retrospective study of 225 patients across Cook County Department of Health clinics found that the novel 1-month 1HP regimen (isoniazid plus rifapentine) for latent TB infection had a completion rate comparable to standard longer regimens and was well tolerated, suggesting it may be a viable shorter alternative.
Drawing Borders Around a Borderless Specialty
Editor in chief Jason Gallagher, PharmD, FCCP, FIDP, FIDSA, BCPS, discusses the proposed OMB rule restricting federal grants for international research collaboration, and how it threatens infectious disease medicine's inherently borderless surveillance networks, publication access, and knowledge-sharing systems.
Beyond Approval: Finding the Right Place for Emerging Gram-Negative Antibiotics
The expanding gram-negative antibiotic pipeline offers important new treatment options; however, FDA approval alone does not define a drug’s place in therapy. Clinicians must weigh the clinical problems that each agent solves, the strength of the evidence behind it, and what remains unknown before incorporating these therapies into routine practice.