The 2021 update to the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommended fidaxomicin as the preferred treatment for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). In a study published in Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 45,049 hospitalized CDI patients from 779 US hospitals showed that fidaxomicin was associated with a lower recurrence rate (6.1% vs. 10.2%) and a higher sustained clinical response (91.7% vs. 87.8%) compared to vancomycin (P < .001 for both).
“In the propensity-matched results, we observed a more favorable sustained response (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.11–1.97) and a lower CDI recurrence rate associated with fidaxomicin (OR, .61; 95% CI, .44–.85),” according to the investigators.1
In 2021, the IDSA and SHEA introduced three new evidence-based guidelines for treating adult CDI. Developed by a multidisciplinary panel, these recommendations focused on treatments for initial and recurrent CDI episodes, incorporating new data on fidaxomicin and bezlotoxumab. The guidelines were based on a systematic review of evidence and assessed the benefits and harms of various treatment options using the GRADE approach.2
3 Key Takeaways
- The 2021 IDSA guidelines recommend fidaxomicin as the preferred treatment for CDI, showing lower recurrence and higher sustained clinical response compared to vancomycin.
- Following the guideline update, fidaxomicin use among hospitalized CDI patients increased significantly, while vancomycin use declined, with no notable difference in 90-day post-discharge costs between the two treatments.
- The findings highlight the need for continued adoption of fidaxomicin and further research to evaluate its effectiveness across diverse patient populations and settings.
This retrospective observational study utilized the PINC AI Healthcare Database to analyze adult patients who received CDI treatment from January 2020 to June 2021 (pre-guideline update) and October 2021 to September 2022 (post-guideline update). The study investigated treatment patterns involving fidaxomicin, vancomycin, and metronidazole, along with clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilization for patients treated exclusively with fidaxomicin versus those treated with vancomycin.
“Notably, fidaxomicin use significantly varied by census region and other hospital characteristics like number of beds,” according to investigators. “After controlling for hospital and patient characteristics, about a third of the variance in fidaxomicin use not explained by these factors was attributable to differences between hospitals.”1
Comparing the pre- and post-guideline update periods, the proportion of patients treated with fidaxomicin increased from 5.9% to 13.7% (P < .001), while vancomycin use decreased from 87.9% to 82.9% (P < .001) and metronidazole use declined from 21.6% to 17.2% (P < .001). There was no significant difference in 90-day post-discharge costs between the two groups. The sensitivity analysis yielded similar results.