|Videos|July 16, 2016

How Should Practitioners Test for the Colistin-Resistant mcr-1 Gene?

Prof. Andrea Endimiani, MD, PhD, from the Institute of Infectious Diseases at the University of Bern, Switzerland, discusses how practitioners should test for colistin-resistant pathogens.

Prof. Andrea Endimiani, MD, PhD, from the Institute of Infectious Diseases at the University of Bern, Switzerland, discusses how practitioners should test for colistin-resistant pathogens.

Interview Transcript (slightly modified for readability)

“We have to distinguish two situations, infection, and colonization. In the case of [an] infection, we are able to detect these mechanisms, or at least we have a suspicion of these mcr-1 mechanism of resistance, because when we detect an isolate, an Escherichia coli [or] a Klebsiella in the clinical laboratory, we preform the antibiotic susceptibility test, and usually we [also] test [for] colistin [resistance], so we can see that the bacteria are resistant to colistin.

A major problem is the second situation, when the patients are only colonized at [the] intestinal level. Since we don’t have a lot of these bacteria [at] the intestinal level, there is a tiny quantity, we need to use [specific] systems to detect them. We can use culture-systems, selective plates that contain colistin to see if [the bacteria] grow in the plates, and then we can [molecularly characterize] them. [As an alternative mechanism of detection], we can [test] the stools of patients, through a rectal swab, with molecular tests. For example, [we can use] real-time PCR that is already described in the literature, to detect the mcr-1 gene. [It is] very [probable that] the performance of the real-time PCR is a little bit better than the culture approach.”


Related to this article

How The Food Safety Surveillance Infrastructure Works in the US
In the first episode of our news series looking at the food safety network, Lynette Johnston, PhD, offers insights into how the federal government surveillance infrastructure operates, and how epidemiologists serve as food detectives in determining bacterial pathogens and potential foodborne outbreaks.
This Week's Top 5 Infectious Disease News Stories: September 12-September 18, 2026
In this week's top infectious disease stories, a Pennsylvania teen became the state's fourth measles death in weeks, the CDC reported a 17% summer surge in rabies exposure calls, new research revisited whether cefepime raises mortality risk, a multihospital review examined ceftriaxone's safety after state alerts, and examining Legionella pneumonia diagnostics.
Ceftriaxone Safety: Separating Signal From Risk
A retrospective multihospital study found that severe adverse events occurred at similarly low rates with ceftriaxone and other IV cephalosporins suggesting there is no evidence to support avoiding ceftriaxone despite recent health department safety alerts.
Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis in a Trice
A retrospective study of 225 patients across Cook County Department of Health clinics found that the novel 1-month 1HP regimen (isoniazid plus rifapentine) for latent TB infection had a completion rate comparable to standard longer regimens and was well tolerated, suggesting it may be a viable shorter alternative.