
New Study Links Rates of Male Circumcision to HIV-2 Prevalence
Male circumcision has been promoted by public health officials as a way of reducing HIV-1 infection rates, and now, the first study of its kind shows that circumcision rates have also impacted the spread of HIV-2 in West Africa.
HIV-2 is neither as widespread nor as virulent as HIV-1, a strain of HIV that accounts for the majority of infections in the ongoing epidemic. Perhaps it is because of this that less research has focused on HIV-2 compared to on HIV-1. However, in a recent study, a team of European and American researchers examined the correlation between male circumcision—which has been linked to reduced HIV-1 prevalence in the past–and rates of HIV-2.
Largely found in West Africa,
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there is meaningful evidence that
Although there has been a series of studies supporting MC as a method of preventing HIV-1 transmission, a team led by University of Leuven researchers in Belgium recently conducted the first investigation into the association between circumcision and HIV-2 prevalence. The
The researchers analyzed more than 260,000 samples collected in 16 West African countries during the first large-scale serological study of HIV-2 from 1985 to 1991, soon after the discovery of the virus. They compared those findings to information on MC rates in 218 ethnic groups in the region. The authors noted that rates of circumcision likely rose during the 20th century due to the spread of Islam—which holds circumcision as a common practice—into areas where circumcision had not been common. In their investigation, the researchers found a robust correlation between HIV-2 seroprevalence and historical prevalence of male circumcision.
“We calculated MC frequencies for ethnic groups and cities over time, and we found, as far as we know for the first time, that HIV-2 prevalence in 1985—91, in West Africa, shows a substantial ecological association with MC, as has been demonstrated for HIV-1, for Africa as a whole, at about the same time period,” wrote the authors in their paper.
From their findings, the authors also examined how circumcision rates in the early 20th century—when HIV-2 is believed to have first emerged—may have influenced where the disease initially took hold. “Differential HIV-2 spread could also reflect viral founder events. Cities with higher HIV-2 prevalence in 1985—91 might have imported the virus earlier, therefore the epidemic focus might have had more time to grow,” explained the authors, noting that circumcision frequency was markedly lower in the cities of Côte d'Ivoire and Guinea-Bissau, the only demonstrably old epicenters of HIV-2. “Indeed, founder events may have been more probable (and might therefore have tended to happen earlier) in cities with increased transmission risk factors, including low MC frequency.”
The authors concluded that their findings reinforce the public health benefits of circumcision in preventing the spread of not just HIV-1, but also HIV-2 and other retroviruses.
Newsletter
Stay ahead of emerging infectious disease threats with expert insights and breaking research. Subscribe now to get updates delivered straight to your inbox.