A new guideline for diagnosing and managing candidiasis from the European Confederation for Medical Mycology (ECMM) addresses emerging pathogens such as C auris, and considers application of recently developed diagnostics and newly licensed antifungals.1 This first of a 2-part report describes guideline diagnostic considerations, with part 2 conveying treatment recommendations.
The guideline was developed by the ECMM in collaboration with the American Society of Miocrobiology (ASM) and the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology (ISHAM). The guideline updates information from previous international recommendations from both the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology an Infectious Diseases, according to the guideline lead author, Oliver Comely, MD, Institute of Translational Research, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Response in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, and colleagues.
The three societies brought together experts from around the world and from multiple disciplines in a global guidance initiative which aims "to improve patient management and outcomes for all forms of candidiasis," Comely and colleagues indicate.They acknowledge, however, "adapting to local contexts based on economic circumstances and antifungal resistance patterns might be needed."
The guideline strongly recommends conventional culture-based methods, while acknowledging limited sensitivity. To enhance the diagnostic yield of blood cultures, drawing greater volumes and incubating higher numbers of bottles is recommended (eg, two to three blood culture sets with 20ml each).To maximize the diagnostic yield of tissue or fluid, the guideline recommends employing microscopy in addition to fungal culture.
Although molecular techniques to detect candidiasis are advancing, the guideline points out that detection is currently restricted to a limited number of Candida spp.It notes that commercial assays are more likely to have undergone extensive analytical clinical validation compared to in-house methods, and so recommends use of commercial assays.