"Azoles are the backbone of treatment for invasive fungal infections, but they all carry a risk of drug-induced liver injury," Thiruvadi said in a recorded presentation accompanying the poster. "There's very little real-world data comparing all of them side-by-side, especially including isavuconazole."
"First, all azoles need liver function monitoring, whichever one you choose," Thiruvadi said. "Second, isavuconazole had the lowest signal of the group, significantly lower than voriconazole and posaconazole. That supports considering it in patients at higher hepatic risk."
Frequently Asked Questions
Which azole antifungal had the lowest hepatotoxicity signal in FAERS?
Isavuconazole had the lowest reporting odds ratio for hepatobiliary adverse events, significantly lower than voriconazole and posaconazole.1
Do all azoles require liver function monitoring?
Yes. All 5 azoles showed significant hepatotoxicity reporting signals, and the investigators recommended liver function monitoring regardless of agent.1
Olorofim is a first-in-class oral orotomide antifungal; in long-term follow-up of Study 32, 88.5% of patients with resolved infections remained free of recurrence.2
Olorofim, Manogepix, and Rezafungin Activity Against Resistant Molds
Olorofim (F2G), a first-in-class oral orotomide, inhibits fungal dihydroorotate dehydrogenase and blocks pyrimidine biosynthesis.2 In long-term follow-up of the phase 2b Study 32 (NCT03583164), 76 of 202 treated patients met inclusion criteria, most often excluded because they continued olorofim through compassionate access.2 In the follow-up cohort, 67.1% had proven infections and 67.1% had high or moderate immunosuppression.2
Of 52 patients whose invasive fungal infection resolved, 46 (88.5%) remained infection free over a mean of 955 days after the last dose.2 Six (11.5%) had pulmonary recurrences at a median of 343 days, and none of 12 resolved bone infections recurred. Recurrence was more frequent among patients with at least 1 later immunosuppressive event, such as transplant or chemotherapy, than among those without (25% vs 7.5%).2
Manogepix, the active moiety of fosmanogepix (Basilea Pharmaceutica), targets the fungal Gwt1 enzyme, and fosmanogepix is in phase 3 trials for invasive candidiasis and invasive mold infections.3 Among 740 US Aspergillus isolates collected from 2017 to 2024, 16 carried CYP51 alterations. Of these, 15 were non-wild-type to itraconazole and 5 to voriconazole, yet manogepix minimum effective concentrations stayed between 0.008 and 0.06 mg/L.3
Rezafungin (Rezzayo; Melinta Therapeutics), a once-weekly echinocandin in phase 2 trials for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, retained activity against 1115 Aspergillus isolates from 25 countries.4 The collection included 55 isolates (4.9%) non-wild-type to itraconazole or voriconazole. Among isolates with CYP51 alterations, rezafungin minimum effective concentrations (MEC50/90) were 0.015/0.03 mg/L vs voriconazole MIC50/90 of 2/more than 8 mg/L.4
References
Thiruvadi V, Ravichandran R, Kagzi Y, et al. Hepatotoxicity signals across azole antifungals: is isavuconazole safer? A pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Presented at: IDWeek 2026; October 21-24, 2026; Washington, DC. Poster P-31.
Thompson GR III, Maertens JA, Spec A, et al. Long-term follow-up of Study 32 (S32LTFU): a retrospective observational study of olorofim as treatment of invasive fungal infections in patients lacking suitable alternative treatment options. Presented at: IDWeek 2026; October 21-24, 2026; Washington, DC. Poster P-4.
Winkler ML, Edeker S, Klauer A, et al. Activity of manogepix against Aspergillus spp. isolates with CYP51 alterations. Presented at: IDWeek 2026; October 21-24, 2026; Washington, DC. Poster P-17.
Winkler ML, Edeker S, Klauer AL, et al. Activity of rezafungin against Aspergillus spp. that are non-wild-type to azole antifungal agents. Presented at: IDWeek 2026; October 21-24, 2026; Washington, DC. Poster P-20.