The phase 3b CROWN trial (NCT06694805) met its primary endpoint.1,2 At 6 months, long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine (Cabenuva; ViiV Healthcare) achieved superior rates of viral suppression vs standard-of-care oral antiretroviral therapy (ART) in adults and adolescents with HIV and detectable virus at study entry.1 Use of the regimen in people with viremia is investigational and has not been approved by regulatory authorities.1
The regimen is currently approved as Cabenuva in the US, and as Vocabria plus Rekambys in the EU and Japan, only for people who are virologically suppressed on a stable regimen.¹ Labeled patients must also have no history of treatment failure and no known or suspected resistance to either agent.1 ViiV Healthcare plans to share the CROWN data with health authorities for regulatory review.1
Data Results
CROWN is an international, randomized, open-label superiority study enrolling approximately 326 adults and adolescents at 85 sites across eight countries.1 Participants either received cabotegravir plus rilpivirine long-acting (CAB + RPV LA) every two months, or six times a year, or continued oral ART.1,2 Eligible participants were aged 12 years or older, weighed at least 35 kg, and had screening HIV-1 RNA above 1000 copies/mL and below 100,000 copies/mL.2
Enrollment required a documented lapse in oral ART of at least 30 consecutive days, along with no evidence of resistance to integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs).1,2 ViiV Healthcare has not yet released suppression rates, effect sizes, P values, or safety data from CROWN.1 Full results are planned for presentation at an upcoming scientific meeting.1
The findings build on the phase 3 LATITUDE trial (NCT03635788), in which 306 participants who first achieved suppression on oral ART were randomized to monthly CAB + RPV LA or continued oral therapy.3 Through 48 weeks, cumulative regimen failure was 22.8% with the long-acting regimen vs 41.2% with oral ART.3 Virologic failure occurred in 6.8% vs 28.2% of participants, respectively (difference, −21.4%; 98.4% CI, −33.5% to −9.3%).3
In LATITUDE, adverse event rates were similar between arms, and injection site reactions were the most common event in the long-acting group.3 Two long-acting arm participants with confirmed virologic failure developed new INSTI resistance-associated mutations.3 Cabenuva labeling carries warnings for hypersensitivity reactions, post-injection reactions, hepatotoxicity, and depressive disorders.3