News|Articles|October 13, 2024

Point-of-Care Hepatitis C Test May Expedite Diagnosis

The Xpert HCV assay facilitates rapid HCV diagnosis in nonclinical settings, aiding high-risk populations like those under community supervision.

This article originally appeared on our sister site, HCPLive.

Testing is key to getting people with hepatitis C into the continuum of care. And, getting people tested can be challenging, especially as the virus can be asymptomatic. However, new research is calling attention to the potential utility of a point-of-care hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA assay (Xpert HCV) in a nontraditional, nonclinical setting for facilitating more rapid diagnosis and linkage to care among individuals under active community supervision.1

Study results showed that the availability of a point-of-care HCV RNA assay for clinical use among individuals under active probation or parole would have enabled 30 people, including 2 with acute HCV infection, to receive an immediate HCV diagnosis, highlighting the feasibility and clinical performance of Xpert HCV in this setting.1

“Progress toward HCV elimination in the US has been stalled by reliance on a multistep diagnostic algorithm to confirm viremia, reducing access to curative treatment,” Leah Harvey, MD, MPH, an infectious disease and addiction medicine physician and an assistant professor in the division of infectious diseases at the Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, and colleagues wrote.1 “In populations at highest risk of infection—including people who use drugs and those involved in the carceral system—treatment is often inaccessible owing to substantial barriers along the HCV care cascade.”

According to the World Health Organization, an estimated 50 million people have chronic HCV infection, with about 1 million new infections occurring per year. Since new HCV infections are often asymptomatic, diagnosis typically does not occur when the infection is recent.2 Risk of infection and delayed diagnosis/treatment are especially prevalent among people who use drugs and those involved in the carceral system.1

What You Need to Know

The new point-of-care Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA assay (Xpert HCV) has demonstrated the ability to provide rapid diagnosis, especially in nonclinical settings like community supervision.

In June 2024, the FDA granted marketing authorization for the Xpert HCV test, which significantly simplifies the HCV testing process.

A study confirmed the feasibility and accuracy of the Xpert HCV test, showing high sensitivity (96.8%) and specificity (99.4%) for detecting HCV RNA.

On June 27, 2024, the FDA granted marketing authorization to Cepheid for the Xpert HCV test and GeneXpert Xpress System, the first point-of-care HCV test allowing for a more rapid test-and-treat approach than the standard multi-step HCV testing process. Rather than requiring a sample to be sent to a central lab for testing, the Xpert HCV detects HCV RNA and provides results in about an hour using a blood sample from the fingertip.3

The test, which is intended for adults at risk of or with signs or symptoms of HCV, can be performed in settings operating under a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) Certificate of Waiver, such as certain substance use disorder treatment facilities; correctional facilities; syringe service programs; doctor’s offices; emergency departments; and urgent care clinics.3 However, its clinical use in a community supervision setting has not yet been explored.1

To examine the feasibility and clinical performance of a point-of-care HCV RNA assay (Xpert HCV) in a nonclinical justice setting, investigators conducted a cross-sectional study of English-speaking adults ≥ 18 years of age under active community supervision status (probation or parole) with unknown HCV status or no self-reported prior HCV treatment.1

Among 482 participants enrolled in a larger HCV antibody study assessing HCV testing and linkage to care for this population, a convenience sample of 203 participants underwent point-of-care HCV RNA testing and were included in the present analysis. Among this group, the median age was 38 (Interquartile range, 31-48.5) years, 78.3% of participants were male, and 47.7% were White. Investigators pointed out approximately ⅓ of participants had not completed high school or reported homelessness.1

In total, 190 (94%) participants had valid laboratory HCV RNA results. Missing data were due to inconclusive results (n = 1), unavailable results (n = 5), or testing was not performed (n = 7).1

Using laboratory HCV RNA testing for confirmation, investigators noted the sensitivity of the point-of-care assay for HCV RNA detection was 96.8% (95% CI, 83.3%-99.9%), and the specificity was 99.4% (95% CI, 96.6%-100%). They also pointed out discrepant RNA results in 2 participants: the first was interpreted as a false positive point-of-care HCV RNA (had reactive HCV antibody, POC HCV RNA detected, laboratory HCV RNA not detected) and the second was interpreted as a false negative point-of-care HCV RNA (nonreactive HCV antibody, POC HCV RNA not detected, laboratory HCV RNA detected).1

Further analysis revealed approximately 9 of 39 participants (23.1%) with reactive HCV antibody did not have detectable HCV RNA (point-of-care and laboratory), indicative of spontaneous HCV clearance. Additionally, a single participant had negative HCV antibody and detectable HCV RNA (point-of-care and laboratory) consistent with acute HCV infection.1

Investigators outlined multiple limitations to these findings, including the potential lack of generalizability to other settings due to the single-site study design; the fact that Xpert HCV was not approved for clinical use when the study was conducted; and the use of referral to complete laboratory-based confirmatory testing, which may have led to delays.1

“Multistep diagnostic algorithms cause unnecessary delay in HCV diagnosis, particularly for marginalized populations. The recent approval of the first POC HCV RNA assay in the US will facilitate same-day initiation of curative HCV treatment in low-barrier, nontraditional settings,” investigators concluded.1


References
  1. Harvey L, Jacka B, Bazerman L, et al. Feasibility and Performance of a Point-of-Care Hepatitis C RNA Assay in a Community Supervision Cohort. JAMA Netw Open. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38222
  2. World Health Organization. Hepatitis C. Newsroom. April 9, 2024. Accessed October 10, 2024. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-c
  3. Brooks, A. FDA Grants Marketing Authorization to Xpert HCV, First Point-of-Care Hepatitis C RNA Test. HCPLive. June 27, 2024. Accessed October 10, 2024. https://www.hcplive.com/view/fda-grants-marketing-authorization-xpert-hcv-first-point-care-hepatitis-c-rna-test

Related to this article

How The Food Safety Surveillance Infrastructure Works in the US
In the first episode of our news series looking at the food safety network, Lynette Johnston, PhD, offers insights into how the federal government surveillance infrastructure operates, and how epidemiologists serve as food detectives in determining bacterial pathogens and potential foodborne outbreaks.
Ebola and the Ongoing Tale of US Failures
In mid-May, as the world was still grappling with an unexpected hantavirus outbreak aboard a tourism vessel, news broke of an Ebola outbreak in the Ituri Province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo spanning at least 3 health zones, including Bunia, Rwampara, and Mongbwalu.
This Week's Top 5 Infectious Disease News Stories: September 12-September 18, 2026
In this week's top infectious disease stories, a Pennsylvania teen became the state's fourth measles death in weeks, the CDC reported a 17% summer surge in rabies exposure calls, new research revisited whether cefepime raises mortality risk, a multihospital review examined ceftriaxone's safety after state alerts, and examining Legionella pneumonia diagnostics.
Measles Update: September 18, 2026
The latest CDC numbers show a 5.37% increase of measles cases from week-to-week. In Pennsylvania, the fourth measles-related death was reported in 2026. Additionally, the CDC has made a change in the way it will report deaths.
CDC Responds to Surge in Rabies Exposures
A "Clinician Outreach" from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in April anticipated an increase in rabies exposures, and the striking surge in case reports this summer prompted a recent health advisory alert from the federal agency.
New Diagnositics for Legionella Pneumonia May Streamline Care Continuum
Reported cases of Legionnaires’ disease have been on the rise for the past decade, and identifying Legionella bacteria requires specialized testing in the microbiology lab. Here is a clinical overview of Legionella bacteria, including required testing, treatment, and reporting to public health officials.
Ceftriaxone Safety: Separating Signal From Risk
A retrospective multihospital study found that severe adverse events occurred at similarly low rates with ceftriaxone and other IV cephalosporins suggesting there is no evidence to support avoiding ceftriaxone despite recent health department safety alerts.