|Articles|February 5, 2020

Large Number of Antibiotics Prescribed Without Any Clinician Visit

In Medicaid data spanning a decade, more than a quarter of prescriptions were not associated with a clinician visit.

Antimicrobial stewardship programs tend to focus on prescribing decisions made when patients who may have an infection visit clinicians. But what happens when antibiotics are prescribed outside of clinician visits or without clear indications for use?

The investigators of a new study published in Health Affairs analyzed data from 1 decade and determined that more than a quarter of prescriptions were not associated with a clinic visit. Additionally, nearly a fifth were associated with visits that did not have a documented infection-related diagnosis.

The study team used national Medicaid claims data collected from 2004 to 2013 taken from the Medicaid Analytic eXtract. Several antibiotics were excluded from the analysis, such as methenamine due to use in urinary tract infection prophylaxis. Other antibiotics excluded include non-oral antibiotics and non-absorbable oral antibiotics such as vancomycin.

Claims records were used to assess whether an antibiotic prescription had been preceded by any kind of clinical encounter. The investigators identified 298 million qualifying antibiotic prescriptions filed for 53 million patients over the study period.

The majority of antibiotics analyzed were prescribed to children, with more than one-third of all prescriptions being for children between the age of 0 to 5 years. More than 40% of antibiotic prescriptions were penicillins, accounting for more than double the prescription count for cephalosporins and macrolides.

The study authors noted that more than 40% of patients in the study cohort were located in the Southern United States, with the remaining patients spread near evenly across other regions. However, patients in the South and Midwest were less likely to have non-visit-based prescriptions and had more antibiotic fills associated with infection-related visits.

Ultimately, 28% of filled antibiotic prescriptions had no claims related to any clinician encounter in the previous 7 days. The study authors did note that around half of that 28% of patients had claims for medical services that did not involve a clinician encounter, such as laboratory testing or home care services by nurses or attendants.

In the remaining 72% of antibiotic prescriptions involving a clinician encounter, 55% included a diagnosis code for infection and 17% were not associated with an infection-related diagnosis.

While it may be inferred that a large proportion of the antibiotics prescribed without clinician encounters were for certain relevant chronic conditions, such prescriptions accounted for only 3% of antibiotics prescribed without an office visit.

Overall, the large numbers of antibiotics prescribed without a clinician visit present a sizable proportion of antibiotic use which would not be able to be evaluated by most existing antimicrobial stewardship programs.

“From a policy perspective, current antibiotic stewardship recommendations and programs are missing a huge proportion of antibiotic prescribing,” the study authors wrote.


Related to this article

This Week's Top 5 Infectious Disease News Stories: September 12-September 18, 2026
In this week's top infectious disease stories, a Pennsylvania teen became the state's fourth measles death in weeks, the CDC reported a 17% summer surge in rabies exposure calls, new research revisited whether cefepime raises mortality risk, a multihospital review examined ceftriaxone's safety after state alerts, and examining Legionella pneumonia diagnostics.
Ceftriaxone Safety: Separating Signal From Risk
A retrospective multihospital study found that severe adverse events occurred at similarly low rates with ceftriaxone and other IV cephalosporins suggesting there is no evidence to support avoiding ceftriaxone despite recent health department safety alerts.
Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis in a Trice
A retrospective study of 225 patients across Cook County Department of Health clinics found that the novel 1-month 1HP regimen (isoniazid plus rifapentine) for latent TB infection had a completion rate comparable to standard longer regimens and was well tolerated, suggesting it may be a viable shorter alternative.
Drawing Borders Around a Borderless Specialty
Editor in chief Jason Gallagher, PharmD, FCCP, FIDP, FIDSA, BCPS, discusses the proposed OMB rule restricting federal grants for international research collaboration, and how it threatens infectious disease medicine's inherently borderless surveillance networks, publication access, and knowledge-sharing systems.
Beyond Approval: Finding the Right Place for Emerging Gram-Negative Antibiotics
The expanding gram-negative antibiotic pipeline offers important new treatment options; however, FDA approval alone does not define a drug’s place in therapy. Clinicians must weigh the clinical problems that each agent solves, the strength of the evidence behind it, and what remains unknown before incorporating these therapies into routine practice.