The Sweden Question: Has Controversial Response Led to T-cell Mediated Immunity?
AUG 06, 2020 | GRANT M. GALLAGHER
In this clip, Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong and Dr. Adam Brufsky have an open minded discussion on the dangers and potential lessons of the course Swedish health officials recommended the country take over the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Neither clinician advocates for a particular policy, but they emphasize the import of being able to have a free discussion for scientific purposes.
Of particular interest is whether or not T-cell mediated immunity has been reached in segments of the Swedish population.
Soon-Shiong emphasizes that the long term consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection remain unknown. Examples such as post-polio syndrome, which strikes sufferers of poliomyelitis virus years later, present frightening possibilities for countries which consider pursuing a natural immunity strategy, according to Brufsky.
Further, they note, health systems in different nations started from vastly varied background health and preparedness early on in the pandemic, making it difficult to draw rigid conclusions across national borders.
Early in the pandemic, a bevy of modeling studies predicted dire consequences for Sweden based on their maverick coronavirus response, which relied on citizens making voluntary decisions about their activities. Many of those predictions, particularly surrounding ICU overwhelm, have not come to pass. Sweden's largest daily paper, Dagens Nyheter, cited modeling which applied the Imperial College London model to Sweden.
"Our model predicts that, using median infection-fatality-rate estimates, at least 96,000 deaths would occur by 1 July,” the authors wrote.
Today, many Swedes walk around in public without a mask, travel across regions, and partake in normal life. Despite a high initial surge of mortality, annual excess deaths are on par with yearly trends for the country. The country has seen almost 90,000 fewer deaths than the widely shared preprint predicted.
Elsewhere, vaccine development is not expected to create population level immunity within the near future, and evidence of non-compliance with social distancing measures suggests that public interest in health measures intended to last until an unknown future point is low. In this context, it is critical to examine outliers in order to draw lessons on clinical ramifications of the different strategies being pursued at the public health level.
Epidemiological Theory Author Dr. Raj Bhopal Calls for Open Discussion
Raj Bhopal, CBE DSc, BSc MD, MPH, MBChB, FRCP, FFPHM, is professor emeritus of public health at the University of Edinburgh, Scotland. He held the chair of Public Health in the university until his retirement in 2018.
Bhopal is also the author of Concepts of Epidemiology: Integrating the Ideas, Theories, Principles, and Methods of Epidemiology.
The article argues that scientific appraisal of the various SARS-CoV-2 interventions introduced in the initial wave of COVID-19 has been stifled by fear based responses to the complex competing ethical priorities societies face, alongside politicization of scientific concepts like population immunity.
In addition, Bhopal uses his background in public health to point toward ways supportive measures could accomplish more than punitive or overly-regulatory ones.
To stay informed on the latest in infectious disease news and developments, please sign upfor our weekly newsletter.
Contagion® is a fully integrated news resource covering all areas of infectious disease. Through our website, quarterly journal, email newsletters, social media outlets, and Outbreak Monitor we provide practitioners and specialists with disease-specific information designed to improve patient outcomes and assist with the identification, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of infectious diseases. Our mission is to assure that the healthcare community and public have the knowledge to make more informed choices and have a positive impact on patient outcomes.
2 Clarke Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512