The trial enrolled at a single cancer center, and key safety outcomes were death, ICU transfer, and septic shock by day 60.1 Antibiotic exposure was assessed alongside those safety measures.1
The investigators wrote final analyses from the completed trial will provide a more definitive assessment.1 All authors on the END trial poster reported no financial relationships.1
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it safe to stop empiric antibiotics early in febrile neutropenia?
In an interim analysis of the END trial, early discontinuation did not increase death, septic shock, or ICU transfer and roughly tripled antibiotic-free days.1
Is 5 days of oseltamivir prophylaxis enough after hospital influenza exposure?
In a randomized trial of 166 hospitalized adults, 5 days of prophylaxis prevented influenza as effectively as 10 days.2
Does intranasal antisepsis reduce bloodstream infections in the ICU?
A stepped-wedge study in 7 ICUs found no significant reduction in hospital-onset bloodstream infections, although the study had fewer events than anticipated.3
Five-Day Oseltamivir Prophylaxis and Intranasal Decolonization in Hospital Infection Prevention
At University Medical Center Ljubljana in Slovenia, 166 hospitalized adults with ongoing influenza exposure, who could not be separated from index cases, were randomized to 5 or 10 days of oseltamivir post-exposure prophylaxis.2 Median age was 78.5 years, and median Charlson comorbidity index was 6. Median duration of exposure was 3 days, defined as sharing a room for at least 12 hours with an index case receiving treatment.2
In the intention-to-treat population, 0 of 82 patients in the 5-day group and 1 of 84 (1.2%) in the 10-day group developed influenza (difference, 1.2 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.15 to 3.55; P = .321).2 No serious adverse events related to oseltamivir were observed. Current recommendations call for 7 to 10 days of prophylaxis after the last exposure, and the investigators concluded the 5-day regimen allows less antiviral exposure.2
In a stepped-wedge prospective cohort across 7 adult ICUs at 3 Geisinger hospitals, once-daily alcohol-based intranasal antisepsis did not significantly reduce hospital-onset bloodstream infections.3 Rates were 11.5 vs 10.4 per 10,000 patient-days before and after implementation (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.50-1.62; P = .74), and the point estimate for primary bloodstream infection favored the intervention (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.31-1.37).3
Compliance exceeded 90%, and only 1 adverse event occurred across more than 21,000 applications.3 Among the 46 infections recorded, the most common organisms were Candida species (14), gram-negative bacteria (12), and Enterococcus species (10).3
Those 46 events were about 40% fewer than anticipated, and all units already used daily chlorhexidine bathing, which may have blunted the effect.3 Unit-level infection rates ranged widely, from 5.8 to 24.8 per 10,000 patient-days, although the study was not powered to explain the difference between units.3
References
Hannaford A, Kovac V, Gupta S, et al. END (Early Neutropenic Fever De-escalation of) Antibiotics Study: an open-label, randomized, controlled phase 4 trial. Presented at: IDWeek 2026; October 21-24, 2026; Washington, DC. Poster P-213.
Stupica D, Gulin J, Pezdirec M, Velušček M. Post-exposure influenza chemoprophylaxis with oseltamivir for five days vs ten days in acute-care hospital: a randomized open-label study. Presented at: IDWeek 2026; October 21-24, 2026; Washington, DC. Poster P-216.
Nazeer Hussain R, Suryadevara V, Bitton N, et al. Impact of universal non-antibiotic intranasal decolonization on hospital-onset bloodstream infections in adult intensive care units. Presented at: IDWeek 2026; October 21-24, 2026; Washington, DC. Poster P-232.