Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine Maintains Efficacy in FLAIR 96-Week Data

Article

New Week 96 data from the FLAIR study indicate that once-monthly injections of cabotegravir and rilpivirine remains non-inferior and safe when compared with the daily, oral 3-drug regimen of ABC/DTG/3TC.

New Week 96 data from the FLAIR study indicate that once-monthly injections of cabotegravir and rilpivirine remains non-inferior and safe when compared with the daily, oral 3-drug regimen of abacavir/dolutegravir/lamivudine (ABC/DTG/3TC).

These findings were presented at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2020) and build on previously presented data through week 48.

FLAIR is a phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter study assessing the intramuscular long-acting injectable cabotegravir and rilpivirine among virologically suppressed adults living with HIV, after 20 weeks of induction therapy with ABC/DTG/3TC.

At Week 96, the investigational regimen demonstrated non-inferiority to ABC/DTG/3TC, measured as the proportion of study participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies per milliliter (cabotegravir + rilpivirine: 9/283 [3.2%], ABC/DTG/3TC: 9/283: [3.2%], adjusted difference: 0.0%, 95% CI: -2.9, 2.9).

The investigators also report that rates of virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL) at week 96 were similar between the 2 treatment groups. In total, 245 of the 283 (86.6%) individuals in the cabotegravir and rilpivirne group were virologically suppressed, compared with 253 of the 283 individuals in the ABC/DTG/3TC treatment group (adjusted difference: -2.8%. 95% CI: -8.2, 2.5).

Among individuals on the cabotegravir and rilpivirine regimen, there were no new confirmed virologic failures reported between Week 48 and Week 96. In the ABC/DTG/3TC group 1 individual developed confirmed virologic failure at Week 64, with no treatment-emergent resistance.

“Treatment with cabotegravir and rilpivirine was generally well-tolerated, with similar rates of severe adverse events (SAEs) (cabotegravir + rilpivirine: 24/283 [8.4%], ABC/DTG/3TC: 22/283 [7.8%]) and AEs leading to withdrawal (cabotegravir + rilpivirine: 12/283 [4.2%], ABC/DTG/3TC: 4/283 [1.4%]) between both treatment arms,” according to a press release issued by ViiV Healthcare.

In the cabotegravir and rilpivirine group, 246 of 278 individuals (88%) reported an injection site reaction (ISR) at some point; however, of the total 12,552 injections only 3100 ISR events were reported. Additionally, nearly all ISRs (99.4%) were mild or moderate, with a median duration of 3 days, with the frequency of these events decreasing over time. In all, 6 participants (2.1%) withdrew for injection-related events.

At Week 48, it was reported than 90.8% of FLAIR participants preferred the long-acting regimen to their oral treatment and were highly satisfied with the injectable treatment. The investigators report that this continued through Week 96 with a statistically significant higher level of treatment satisfaction for cabotegravir rilipvirine compared with patients on daily oral ABC/DTG/3TC: mean difference of total scores (between group difference in adjusted mean change from baseline: 2.3 points, 95% CI (1.1, 3.5), p<0.001).

“Seeing the longer-term data is really exciting. It confirms that the long-acting, 2-drug regimen of cabotegravir and rilpivirine has maintained its efficacy and has the potential to be a generally well-tolerated alternative to the standard-of-care, daily, oral pill,” Chloe Orkin, MD, consultant physician and clinical professor at Queen Mary University of London, and principal investigator of the FLAIR study said in a statement. “For some people living with HIV, reducing their dosing schedules from 365 days per year to 12 may be a realistic option in the future.”

Newsletter

Stay ahead of emerging infectious disease threats with expert insights and breaking research. Subscribe now to get updates delivered straight to your inbox.

Recent Videos
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.