Improving the Transition from Adolescent to Adult HIV Care


The transition from youth to adult HIV care is a critical juncture that provides opportunities for continued engagement if handled well. What role should adult care clinics play to maximize the number of adolescents who stay in treatment?

Amanda Tanner, PhD, MPH

Although the number of new HIV infections in young gay and bisexual men fell 18% yearly between 2008 and 2014, overall infection rates among young individuals in the United States (between ages 13 and 24) are rising, with this age group accounting for 22% of new infections each year. Unfortunately, fewer than half of infected youth are aware of their status, and even fewer of those are receiving treatment.

For young individuals receiving treatment, transitioning to an adult model of care presents a potential stumbling block to achieving and maintaining viral suppression—and as 25,000 young individuals infected with HIV are poised to graduate to adult HIV care within the next 10 years, the importance of a successful transition cannot be minimized.

In 2013, the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a set of guidelines for a successful youth-to-adult HIV care transition, but they were directed mainly at clinics catering to adolescents and young adults. What, then, is the role of the adult HIV clinic at this juncture?

A team of investigators from the University of North Carolina Greensboro sought to answer this question by collecting data from a small sample of geographically diverse clinics and interviewing personnel such as doctors, nurses, social workers, and case managers. The researchers discovered that providers at many adult clinics had assumed that youth clinics adequately prepared patients to “move up” to adult care by teaching them how to manage their own health insurance, refill medications in a timely manner, schedule regular appointments, and be on time for those appointments. However, the adult care providers were finding that many of the youths were not ready to transition.

“We do see differences in pediatric/adolescent and adult clinics’ behavior expectations,” lead author of the study Amanda Tanner, PhD, MPH, assistant professor in the School of Health & Human Sciences, Department of Public Health Education, at the University of North Carolina Greensboro, told Contagion ®. “Adolescent clinics tend to have more resources to support youth, [such as] funds for transportation to clinics, smaller caseloads, and more on-site comprehensive services, and [they] do more hand-holding [with] youth— [such as sending] text message appointment reminders, seeing youth even if they are late for their appointments —than adult clinics can provide. This hand-holding can be extremely helpful for youth to stay engaged in care at the adolescent clinic; however, it may leave youth underprepared to meet the behavioral expectations of the adult clinics.”

Formal processes that facilitate communication between clinics and data sharing are needed, the researchers claim. These may include having the staff at the adult clinic meet each youth at the adolescent clinic before the transition, although billing and payment may be a problem if clinics are not part of the same medical system. Another option is for personnel at adolescent clinics to join youth at their first visit at an adult clinic. One adult clinic reported that it offered a peer navigator, a patient with HIV who met with transitioning youth to offer information, emotional support, and even just to provide company at medical visits. Overall, the staff interviewed felt that additional flexibility and friendliness could go a long way toward helping adolescents make the transition to adult care and continue with their treatment.

Still, obstacles are likely to remain even with a smoother hand-off from youth to adult HIV care. “We often think of progress through the HIV care continuum as linear, but there are many points [of], and reasons for, dropping out of care and then re-engaging in care for youth,” Dr. Tanner told Contagion ®. “There are so many factors that contribute to individual outcomes, including individual issues [such as] mental health, substance use, [and] housing stability, as well as structural [factors such as] geography, poverty, and HIV prevalence. For example, if an adolescent or adult lives in an urban environment that has a preeminent HIV clinic and can access it, then they will likely fare better than someone in a rural, underserved location. So, the health care system contributes to individual outcomes, but they are only one piece to this puzzle.”

Laurie Saloman, MS, is a health writer with more than 20 years of experience working for both consumer and physician-focused publications. She is a graduate of Brandeis University and the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University. She lives in New Jersey with her family.

Related Videos
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.